Nursing proposal
Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each section of the rubric should be a section of your final paper and could become the headings. Your assignment will be graded based on each element of the rubric. Compare each section of your paper with the rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an introduction and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions regarding the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course Help forum.As a nursing leader you will have the opportunity to implement many proposals. This is an exercise to help you learn the processes or steps you will need for implementation. Utilizing assignment one choose one of the program outcomes and develop a quality assurance/capstone project that you believe would be beneficial to your area of employment, or the profession of nursing in general.Topic: Enhance professional nursing practice through the use of research and evidence-based practice, a quality assurance project that will benefit emergency room care.In assignment 2 you will address the following points.the capstone project topic.review of the literature to validate the importance of the project.Location for the proposed planthree outcomes you plan to achieve.how the project will impact your workplace and your institutionhow the project will impact your nursing practice, your workplace and nursing as a professionHowever, please note that there is no expectation that you will implement this plan. If you are using a plan from a previous course, you must make significant changes to your paper or cite yourself. Using previously graded work is self-plagiarism.Grading RubricCompetency20 points12 points7 points0 pointsTotal PointsDevelops a well-organized discussion of the capstone project and reviews the literature to support the validity of the project.Develops a well-organized discussion of the capstone project and reviews the literature to support the validity of the project.Discussion of capstone project minimally describes the importance of the project and/or literature does not support the validity of the projectDiscussion of capstone project is poorly stated and/or the literature review is missing or poorly supports the validity of the project.No paper submitted or content missing./20Provides a detailed summary of the location and key players (stakeholders) necessary for success of the project.Provides a detailed summary of the location and key players (stakeholders) necessary for success of the project.Provides a summary and discussion of the location as well as key players for the project but content is missing or not in-depth enoughProvides vague and poorly presented discussion of the location and key stakeholders for the project and/or content is missingDoes not describes the proposed plan or no paper submitted/20Identifies 3 or 4 measurable outcomes you plan to achieve with the project.Identifies 3 or 4 measurable outcomes you plan to achieve with the project.Identifies at least 2 measurable outcomes you plan to achieve with the project.Identifies 1 outcomes for the proposed planDoes not identify outcomes for the proposed plan or no paper submitted/2010 points7 points1 point0 pointsDescribes in detail the benefits of the plan to the institutionDescribes in detail the benefits of the plan to the institutionDescribes some of the benefits of the plan to the institutionVaguely (lists) describes the benefits of the plan to the institutionDoes not describe the benefits of the plan to the institution or no paper submitted/10Discusses in detail the resources needed to implement your plan and the potential budget requirementsDiscusses in detail the resources needed to implement your plan and the potential budget requirementsIdentifies some of the resources needed to implement your plan and the potential budget requirementsVaguely (lists) discusses the resources needed to implement your plan and the potential budget requirementsDoes not identify the resources needed and the potential budget requirements or no paper submitted/10Competency5 points2 points1 point0 pointsOrganizationOrganization excellent, ideas clear and arranged logically, transitions smooth, no flaws in logic.Organization good; ideas usually clear and arranged in acceptable sequence; transitions usually smooth, good support.Organization minimally effective; problems in approach, sequence, support and transitions.Organization does not meet requirements./5GrammarGrammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage correct and idiomatic, consistent with Standard American English.Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage good mostly consistent with Standard American English; errors do not interfere with meaning or understanding.Grammar, punctuation, mechanics and usage distracting and often interfere with meaning or understanding.Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage interfere with understanding./5Competency3 points2 points1 point0 pointsReferencesReferences are relevant, authoritative and contemporary.Adequate references.Minimal use of appropriate references.Poor use and/or selection of references not relevant./3Competency7 points3 points1 point0 pointsAPA FormatDemonstrates competent use of mechanics and APA.Minimal APA errors.Many APA errors.Complete lack of understanding./7Total Points Possible/100
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
